You're about to explore your cognitive profile. Please take a moment to read what we collect and why.

Research prototype

PCMS is a voluntary research questionnaire in active development. It maps self-reported tendencies on continuous dimensions for scientific learning about cognitive diversity. Scores are not yet validated for placement, screening, or eligibility decisions.

This tool has not yet received institutional research ethics approval as a finished study. Data you allow us to receive may be used for instrument development and aggregate research reporting only.

Session data are stored locally in this browser. The assessment flow does not collect your name, email, or postal address. This deployment has optional cloud storage: only if you explicitly opt in below, pseudonymous session summaries may sync to the configured research database (see Privacy). If cloud storage is not used, nothing leaves this device except what you export or share.

Step 1 of 2

Research purpose & what is measured

What this system is

PCMS is a voluntary research questionnaire. It explores self-reported tendencies on continuous dimensions to support scientific understanding of cognitive diversity. Use it for reflection and research participation; treatment planning and formal eligibility decisions belong with qualified professionals.

What is measured

The assessment asks about preferences and typical behaviours. Ten dimensions summarise patterns (for example focus, sensory comfort, or planning style). Each score is a tendency on a scale—descriptive, not a ranking of overall ability.

  • Focus Intensity

    How strongly you sustain attention on one stream of information versus shifting when distractions appear.

  • Pattern Processing

    Preference for concrete procedures versus spotting rules, regularities, and abstract structure.

  • Sensory Sensitivity

    How strongly light, sound, texture, and other sensory load affect comfort and concentration.

  • Social Energy

    How social interaction affects your energy—drawing stimulation from others versus needing recovery time after groups.

  • Structure Preference

    Comfort with fixed plans and predictable rhythms versus improvising when schedules or expectations shift.

  • Cognitive Flexibility

    Ease of revising mental models when information is incomplete, contradictory, or changing.

  • Temporal Processing

    Awareness of duration, pacing, and deadlines versus immersion where clock time fades into the background.

  • Interoceptive Awareness

    How clearly internal bodily signals—tension, fatigue, hunger—reach conscious attention.

  • Associative Thinking

    Tendency toward tight stepwise links versus wide, metaphor-rich, or tangential idea connections.

  • Verbal–Visual Processing

    Relative weight of language and ordered steps versus imagery, layout, and spatial wholes when thinking.